Holley v. Adams
544 S.W.2d 367 (Tex. 1976)
Quick Take
Holley v. Adams is one of the most influential cases in Family Law law, cited 2,847 times by subsequent courts. This level of citation indicates a foundational precedent that lawyers regularly rely on. Its citation status is "good law," meaning courts continue to follow and affirm this ruling — it remains authoritative.
How to Use This Case
When to cite:
This case has good-law status and is regularly cited in Family Law arguments. It's appropriate to cite when you need authority on Best interest of the child or Holley factors.
Key arguments it supports:
- Courts must consider the desires of the child, emotional and physical needs of the child now and in the future, emotional and physical danger to the child, parental abilities, programs available to assist, plans for the child, stability of the home, acts or omissions of the parent, and any excuse for acts or omissions
- The list of best-interest factors is non-exclusive — courts may consider any relevant evidence
- No single factor is controlling; the analysis is holistic
Court level & jurisdiction:
As a Supreme Court of Texas decision, this ruling is binding on all lower courts within its jurisdiction and highly persuasive nationwide. With 2,847 citations, courts clearly find it authoritative.
Summary
The Texas Supreme Court established the foundational factors for determining the best interest of a child in custody proceedings. The Court set forth a non-exclusive list of factors that courts should consider, which has become the standard framework used in virtually every Texas custody case since its publication.
The Holley factors remain the most-cited test in Texas family law and are applied in original custody determinations, modifications, termination proceedings, and conservatorship disputes.
Key Holdings
- 1Courts must consider the desires of the child, emotional and physical needs of the child now and in the future, emotional and physical danger to the child, parental abilities, programs available to assist, plans for the child, stability of the home, acts or omissions of the parent, and any excuse for acts or omissions
- 2The list of best-interest factors is non-exclusive — courts may consider any relevant evidence
- 3No single factor is controlling; the analysis is holistic
Why This Case Matters
Established the universally-applied 'Holley factors' for best-interest determinations in Texas. This case is cited in nearly every family law proceeding involving children in the state.
Facts
Custody dispute between parents where the trial court awarded custody to the father. Mother appealed arguing the court failed to properly consider the child's best interest. The Supreme Court used the opportunity to articulate the comprehensive factors trial courts should consider.
Legal Principles
Statutes Interpreted
- Tex. Fam. Code § 153.002
Related Cases
In re C.J.C.
603 S.W.3d 804 (Tex. 2020)
The Texas Supreme Court clarified the standard for modifying a custody order under Texas Family Code § 156.101. The Court held that a material and substantial change in circumstances must be proven before the trial court may consider whether modification serves the child's best interest. The Court emphasized that the two-pronged test requires threshold proof of changed circumstances as a gatekeeping function, separate from the best-interest analysis.
Lenz v. Lenz
79 S.W.3d 10 (Tex. 2002)
The Texas Supreme Court addressed the circumstances under which a trial court may restrict a parent's constitutional right to travel by imposing geographic restrictions on the primary conservator's residence. The Court held that geographic restrictions on a parent's domicile must be justified by the child's best interest and that the restriction must be narrowly tailored.
Get Weekly Case Updates
New case summaries and legal research tips delivered to your inbox every week. Free for Texas attorneys.